Full
report on the Aston Villa v Horncastle Town F.A. Cup Tie. Birmingham Daily Post
7th February 1887
Considering that this match was looked upon as a moral certainty for the
Villa, the attendance at Perry Barr on Saturday was a very
good one, some five thousand being present. As was anticipated
, the Villa won easily, being superior to their opponents at
all points of the game. Next Saturday the Villa meet the
Darwen at Perry Barr in the sixth round of the National Cup,
and, if successful , will then take part in the semi-final.
The visitors won the toss , and Archie Hunter kicked off
uphill in the face of a stiff wind. His team immediately
attacked, and a foul was given them near the visitors goal,
but nothing resulted. J. and W. Turner, on the visitors right
wing, then transferred play to the other end of the field, the
former putting in a fine shot, which Warner knocked out. The
Villa forwards assaulted the visitors’
goal, but without success; whilst just afterwards a mis-kick
by Coulton caused Horncastle to appear very dangerous, but the
Villa back fortunately recovered himself, and kicked outside.
From the throw in the Villa rushed up the field, and a shot by
Albert Brown compelled the goalkeeper to concede a corner. The
kick was taken , and Hodgetts headed the ball against the
crossbar of the visitors goal. The ball rebounded into play ,
and both Archie Hunter and Brown had a try to score, the
Horncastle custodian punching out both shots. The visitors
left wing relieved the pressure and carried the ball some
distance out of their own goal ; but this run was quickly
stopped by Yates, who lifted the ball just into the goalmouth.
The Villa forwards made a strenuous effort to rush it through,
but failed. Not to be denied, however, they again bored down
on the Horncastle citadel, and from a centre from Hodgetts,
Albert Brown shot the ball past Jeffrey. Immediately on
restarting Albert Brown made a beautiful run, but kicked the
ball over the crossbar. From the goal-kick the Horncastle men
carried the ball into the Villa’s territory, but they could not break through the defence
and were quickly driven backupon their own goal. A shot by
Vaughton was caught by the goalkeeper, Brown trying without
success to rush him through. The goalkeeper threw the ball out
of danger, but it was returned and kicked outside. At length,
however, the Villa forwards took the ball well into the the
front of their opponent’s
goal, and Brown was enabled to put in a second successful
shot. The wind by this time had veered round, and with its aid
the Villa did all the pressing, and shortly before the
interval Albert Brown once more lowered the visitors colours.
On recommencing play after, the visitors made an assault on
the Villa goal, and Searby put in a fine shot, which Warner
managed to punch away. The Villa retaliated by carrying the
ball into their opponents’
quarters but Vaughton kicked over the bar. The Villa now
played very loosely, apparently being content to rest on their
advantage and the game of the tamest character. Until about a
quarter of an hour before time nothing further was scored;
then from a run by Brown and Davis, Archie Hunter obtained a
fourth goal for the winning side. The visitors tried their
hardest to score, and B. Robinson put in a good shot, which
Warner had some difficulty in stopping. Shortly before time,
Albert Brown got the ball in the middle of the field, and ran
it past half backs and backs, finally touching it past the
goalkeeper. No further score was made and the Villa thus won
by 5 goals to nil. The following were the team:- Horncastle;
W. Jeffrey, goal: Inge and A. Langley, backs; F. Chapman, J.
Searby, and J. Green, half-backs; J. Turner and W. Turner
(right wing ), B. Robinson (centre ), E. Tweed and R. Turner
(left wing), forwards. Villa : Warner, goal; Coulton and
Simmonds, backs; Yates, Dawson, and Burton, half backs;
Hodgetts and Vaughton (centre), Brown and Davis, (right wing),
forwards. Umpires : Mr Fairhurst, Bolton; and Mr Hutchinson,
Grantham. Referee: Mr McIntyre, Manchester.
THE FULL REPORT ON THE F.A CUP TIE BETWEEN HORNCASTLE TOWN v ASTON VILLA
PLAYED AT PERRY BARR AS REPORTED IN THE BIRMINGHAM DAILY
GAZETTE ON THE 7th FEB 1887 .
FOOTBALL
ASSOCIATION RULES
ENGLISH CUP -------------------- FIFTH ROUND
Aston Villa v Horncastle - A very ordinary “gate” witnessed this match in the fifth round of the
English Cup at Perry Barr on Saturday afternoon. As was
confidently expected, the Villa were not troubled much with
their opponents, and won after a very poor game by five goals
to none. There were about 3,500 people present , when the
visitors, having won the toss, elected to play down hill
towards the Wellington Road goal with a strong breeze in their
favour. Hunter kicked off , and with little preliminary play
in mid-field the right wing of Horncastle, got the ball and
rushed it down the field. J. Turner upset Simmonds, and then
sent in a magnificent shot, which Warner with difficulty
saved. Shortly afterwards R. Turner dribbled the ball up, and
Coulton running up to meet him made a very considerable miss
leaving the goal open. Coulton, however, roused himself, and
charging his man sent the ball spinning up hill. The Villa now
assumed the aggressive and played a vigorous game, with the
result that they were swarming the visitors goal for some
minutes. Hodgetts headed the ball right on to the crossbar,
and, subsequent to this , Archie Hunter and Albert Brown were
each unsuccessful in their attempts to score. The Villa still
continued their offensive tactics, and when the game had
started about ten minutes Davis scored a splendid goal after
the ball had been bobbing round the Horncastle goal. Some
grand passing by the whole string of Villa forwards again gave
them advantage, and Inge and Langley had their work cut out to
avert the danger. A shot by Albert Brown narrowly missed
scoring, and some slight breaks away by the Horncastle
forwards relieved the pressure on their goal for a time. The
visitors seldom eluded the half backs, and when they did they
were never very dangerous. A corner well placed by Hodgetts
was three times sent into the Horncastle goal, but Searby and
Chapman eventually cleared. Some good play on the visitors’
right wing placed the Villa defence on the alert. The ball was
at length kicked out, and from the goal kick the home forwards
rushed up the field, and Albert Brown scored a second goal
after half an hour’s play. The Villa continued to have the best of the
game, and Albert Brown added a third point from a centre by
Yates, Langley making an ineffectual attempt to save. At this
point in the game the wind completely changed round, and some
clouds passing over the field made the light very bad. Soon
after Hunter sent in a scorching shot, but the goalkeeper
saved splendidly. Half-time was called with the score standing
Villa 3; Horncastle, 0. On resuming Searby made a capital run
for the Horncastle men, and sent in a shot which looked
extremely dangerous. After this the play fell off to an
alarming extent, and the spectators were not slow to comment
thereon. Some twenty minutes from time, from a pass by Richard
Davis, Hunter scored a fourth point, and after Robinson with
Turner had put in a good run Albert Brown again scored. The
game thus ended Villa 5; Horncastle none Teams:- Aston Villa;
Warner, goal, Simmonds and Coulton, backs; Burton, Dawson, and
Yates, half-backs; Brown and Davis, right; Hunter, centre;
Hodgetts and Vaughton, left; Horncastle : Jeffrey, goal; Inge
and Langley, backs; Chapman Searby, and Green, half backs; J.
Turner, and W. Turner, right; Robinson, centre; Tweed and R.
Turner, left; Referee, Mr. McIntyre, of Manchester.
BIRMINGHAM DAILY GAZETTE 7th FEB 1887
FOOTBALL GOSSIP
“Aston
Villa or Horncastle v Darwen”
was to football readers the most interesting item of
information in Tuesday’s
Daily Gazette. It was a great relief. Our club might have been
drawn against Preston North End or, even worse still, against
West Bromwich Albion. That would have been a case of cutting
one another’s throats with a vengeance. Fortunately it was
otherwise, and the chances of the Villa for the final round
have during the week been eagerly discussed. On looking
through the results of past matches, we do not find that
Horncastle have done anything very alarming in the English
Cup. In the first round Horncastle beat Darlington by two
goals to one, no very brilliant performance. In the second
round a bye fell to the club, and in the third round Grantham
were beaten by two goals to one; Again nothing very brilliant.
In the fourth round Horncastle again drew a bye and so passed
on to the fifth to meet the Villa. Thus it will be seen that
out of four rounds Horncastle has twice drawn byes, and has
defeated two clubs, neither of which by any means be
considered first class by small majorities . Darwen’s
record is somewhat better, but shows two byes out of four
rounds . In the first round the club defeated Heart of
Midlothian by seven goals to one-a good performance. In the
second round Astley Bridge and Burnley were disqualified, and
Darwen walked into the third round, there meeting the Bolton
Wanderers which club retired defeated by four goals to
three-another good performance. In the fourth round Darwen
drew a bye, and in the fifth disposed of Chirk by two goals to
one. Thus it will be seen that the Villa will have to put in
all they know to defeat the Lancashire gentlemen.
The match on Saturday was all round voted a poor show. It was not that the
number of spectators was small, but that the match seemed
unutterably tame throughout. The Villa just prior to the kick
off were photographed in costume, and on going on to the field
it was soon to be seen that there could be no as to the issue
of the match. The Horncastle team is an agricultural one, the
town, notable only as the locality from which Marwood, (the
hangman), issued to perform his lugubrious work, being some
miles north of Lincoln. The team taken all round is a small
one, and though some good play was seen on their part the
Horncastle men are distinctly of less calibre than their
opponents. The best shot seen throughout the game was the
first one when J. Turner getting hold of the ball, ran down
past Simmonds and Coulton, and put in the ball with a
magnificent shot . Fortunately Warner was in goal, or things
would have looked black for Villa. After this Villa did all
the pressing , and Albert Brown was eminently successful
scoring four out of five goals. When the home team had scored
three goals they fell off wonderfully, and, apparently being
satisfied with the fact that they were in front, did not make
any great effort to score. The game occasionally was rough ,
and sometimes rough, and sometimes amusing , but as a display
of scientific football it was a dead failure.
--------------------------------
As regards the merits of the players there is not much to be said. Albert
Brown was fortunate in scoring so many goals but the man who
did the most and the best work was Yates. The way in which
Yates gets round the ball on the line and screws it into play
is very fine. Coulton showed up better in the second half than
in the first, and Simmonds, though was brilliant, was
uncertain . The Horncastle team possess one or two good men ,
who if placed in a better combination would show to advantage.
The man who most distinguished himself was Jeffrey in goal.
Jeffrey is a farmer in Lincolnshire, and the way in which he
gains his expertness is by setting up two posts and getting
the labourers to kick the ball at him. We should much like to
see Jeffrey practising. It would be great fun to see Hodge
playing football. Langley was the best of the backs, and
Chapman and Searby of the half-backs Among the forwards the
right wing was better than the left, J. Turner and W. Turner
proving themselves very expert . Robinson in the centre was
extremely serviceable.
We are willing to put the display of the Villa on Saturday down to the fact
that they had not opponents worthy of their steel; but it is
not satisfactory coming after the Small Heath Alliance
display. In the Monday match the Villa acted in the same come
day go day style, and it was only when they found the Small
Heathans had secured two goals to none that they brightened up
and saved . At all events something better will have to be
shown when next Saturday the Darwen men are antagonised.
During the week the Villa will continue training at Mr. W. W. Alexander’s,
as they have during the past fortnight. Every day the men turn
up to take a pipe opener to Sutton Coldfield, and then
practise shooting in the afternoon. Dinner comes at half-past
five ‘clock,
and then the men stay at the headquarters playing cards and
otherwise amusing themselves, so they shall not go astray till
half past ten o’clock.
RESEARCHERS COMMENTS
THE GREATEST GAME IN THE HISTORY OF HORNCASTLE TOWN F.C
ASTON VILLA v HORNCASTLE TOWN
This game must stand out as the biggest game ever, that the Horncastle lads
have played in . It is now a 110 years since the game was
played, and one must give and take a little on the reporting
on the game.
The Horncastle News, I thought, reported the whole scenario very well giving
the Horncastle men the credit they deserved.
The Birmingham Post was a straight forward report but there were not many
pats on the back for the Wongites.
The person who wrote for the Birmingham Gazette didn’t
win many medals from me( the researcher.) He said there was a
crowd of about 3, 500 but the Birmingham Post said there was a
gate of 5,000. Ah well there must have been a hole in the
hedge where the non- paying spectators could get through,
or maybe the turnstiles were in need of repair !
‘The
Horncastle team is an agricultural one .’ I am not going to try and answer that one.’
‘Horncastle
notable only as the locality from which Marwood ( the hangman)
issued to perform his lugubrious work ! ‘
Perhaps he should have been more careful relating to Mr John Marwood-
because he could quickly tie the knot, and I am not talking
about collar and tie.
‘Horncastle
some miles north of Lincoln.’
He was no good at Geography was he?
He goes on, ‘The
team taken all round is a small one, and though some good play
was seen on their part the Horncastle men are distinctly of
less calibre.’
Here are some of the results , Villa beat top clubs of that
period.
Don’t
forget Horncastle lost 5-0.
London Caledonians 0 Villa 11
Lincoln City 1 .. 4
Sheffield Wednesday 0 .. 7
Queens Park 1 .. 3
Notts Rangers 0 .. 7
Wolverhampton Wdrs 1 .. 5
Oxford University 2 .. 5
Middlesborough 0 .. 8
Derby County 0 .. 3
Stafford Rangers 1 Villa 3
Wolverhampton Wdrs 1 .. 6
West Bromwich Albion 1 .. 1
Derby County 1 .. 3
Corinthians 1 .. 4
Greenock Morton 3 .. 7
Hibernian 3 .. 8
Queens Park 3 .. 5
So I reckon Horncastle did very well. Well done the Town!
I see in the last paragraph Villa’s training included a “pipe
opener in the morning.”
Your guess is as good as mine. ‘ Shooting practise in the afternoon. Dinner at 5.00.p.m.
and the men stay at their headquarters, playing cards or
amusing themselves so that they shall not go astray till half
past ten o’clock’.
And then I sincerely hope straight to bed !
So that’s
how they trained in 1887 . Well there you are I have had my
say, and I am sure if I had had the pleasure of meeting the
reporter of the Birmingham Gazette some 110 years ago we would
have had a pint and gone home friends.
Full
report on the
Aston Villa v Horncastle Town F.A. Cup Tie . Birmingham Horncastle News 1887
Full
report on the Aston Villa v Horncastle Town F.A. Cup Tie . Birmingham Daily Post 7th
February 1887